|
|
Post by witness on Mar 9, 2006 10:50:03 GMT -5
they bowled on a brutal condition and fagan couldn't hit the pocket. lost 3 out of 4 to wally with a lucky win. 1000 a game.
|
|
|
|
Post by HOW on Mar 9, 2006 12:07:45 GMT -5
is this the same fagan as the tour guy who made a couple of shows? i keep hearing that he is invinceable.
i guess not. that big nose dave botchowsky was probably betting on him and jinxed him.
|
|
|
|
Post by CHANNEL 2 NEWS on Mar 9, 2006 14:53:54 GMT -5
this just in, fagan is overrated. jim wallace kicks his ass at massapequa for 2 large.
|
|
|
|
Post by PINK PANTHER on Mar 9, 2006 15:29:18 GMT -5
i detect a fraud is lurking on the PBA tour. Somebody better get a clue.
|
|
|
|
Post by donk on Mar 9, 2006 20:52:58 GMT -5
they bowled on 60 feet of oil, what does that prove
|
|
|
|
Post by more truth on Mar 9, 2006 22:59:22 GMT -5
they both throwing the ball straight at the headpin no friction on the lane except at the foul line, all it proved is who got luckier, not splitting and getting crossovers to carry. wallace missed a 5pin, real great shot to bowl on, it was more like a circus match, billy red won't bet on anyone over fagan on a shot where there is friction on the lane. he is smart, but a coward
|
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Mar 9, 2006 23:08:47 GMT -5
Who backed Wallace and Fagan?
|
|
|
|
Post by truthfully on Mar 10, 2006 0:15:07 GMT -5
it was a match of accuracy and fagan failed. he cant hit his target, thats what it proved. fagan donated again.
|
|
jimmy
Junior Member
Posts: 70
|
Post by jimmy on Mar 10, 2006 4:12:29 GMT -5
First off wallace only bowled if Fagan gave him 10 pins. Without the ten pins handicap they woulda split cuz fagan won the first game by 4 . So scratch they split 2 and 2 . It was a joke anyways , the match was suppose to be norm and alex against billy and wally , but as usual billy dont get his shoes on when hes at a distinct disadvantage. Action against billy is a joke anyway. He has to pick the bowling alley the, the pair , who bowls , what shot is out there. When is the Alex and norm against billy and wally match gonna go down ? We only come down to bet against you , and you never bowl . You think you're an action legend but you'll never bowl alex , and defintely not fagan. Let us know when you're actually gonna put your shoes on and we'll come down and the bet can be alot more than 1000.
|
|
|
|
Post by billy red on Mar 10, 2006 7:53:43 GMT -5
jimmy
i dont bowl anymore. you want a guy who bowls 3 games a week and needs knee surgery to bowl guys who are on tour. fagan offered the 10 pins and got robbed. i stole your money again jimmy. your too stupid to beat me.I will never bowl alex? i've been bowling alex for 5 years and i am undefeated you jerkoff. you picked the pair for the match and even one of your guys did the lanes(ginsberg).
you know whats funny? you come on here like a tough guy and think your tough and when you see me your like a little weasel.
jimmy, you will never bet more than me. you had a touring pro who has made 2 shows this year, your crew did the lanes and you only bet 1000. you talk shit but when it comes down to it, you are a nothing.
i am a legend and you are a punk.
when i was bowling i was unbeatable.
now i bet on guys who are unbeatable.
your whole crew never wins. i have never seen a bunch of non-winners in my life.
fagan proved that without fiction he is a 168 bowler like everyone thought he was.
and wally didn't lose the 1st game. he threw the fill ball away. and the game fagan won, he threw 9 brooklyn's.
there are 2 sides to every story. jimmy's side and then the truth.
|
|
|
|
Post by stat junky on Mar 10, 2006 9:05:54 GMT -5
If you are undefeated against Alex, then Alex is undefeated also because according to my files the only times you two faced off one on one was at Harbor Lanes and both times ended in a stalemate.
Even if Wallace threw away the fill ball the first game it wouldn't of mattered, Fagan won by more than Wallace could've picked up. They were 2-2 scratch.
In a couple of weeks when the tour is over Fagan will be looking for the same match, if you give this match scratch, I guarantee you, you can bet whatever you want. Since you stated how confident you are in the bowlers you back now, I assume this will not be a problem. Leave a yes or no and it will be on after the tour season is over.
The Statistician (part of the 'crew')
|
|
|
|
Post by i was there on Mar 10, 2006 9:33:42 GMT -5
stat junky is wrong wally lost by 3 pins after throwin 5 on the fill when it was out. i know i was there.
and it dont matter wally totally out bowled fagan. period and woulda came 34 up if they bowled 32 more games
|
|
|
|
Post by wrong on Mar 10, 2006 11:32:06 GMT -5
incorrect wally went 6 on the fill, left the 1-2-4-7, fagan got 9, and won by 4pins
|
|
|
|
Post by RIGHT on Mar 10, 2006 11:34:31 GMT -5
FAGAN SUCKS AND HE PROVED IT
|
|
|
|
Post by better on Mar 10, 2006 13:43:31 GMT -5
billy sucks and he proved it, by not lacing up
|
|
|
|
Post by Suck my WANG on Mar 10, 2006 17:06:51 GMT -5
So I see that the fat bastard Billy Red backed Wallace. Fagan gave him ten pins. What the fu-- was he smokin? Wally almost made the finals in the US open. Fagan is good but not that good to spot Wally ten pins. Maybe he wants to give the best around Scianna ten pins. Fagan should stick to the tour since he seems to be going brain dead spotting Wally ten pins.
|
|
jimmy
Junior Member
Posts: 70
|
Post by jimmy on Mar 10, 2006 17:11:13 GMT -5
yea i kno billy im on here being tuff right ? . Im not coming on here saying im gonna beat people up , that would be acting tuff im just tellin it like it is. You say that was real bowling. it was 60 feet of puddles . Where is that real bowling ? what tornament have you or anyone else been to where that is the condition ? bowl on all 5 tour patterns and back wally against fagan and see where that gets you. Im sure you dont think the tour is real owling tho. Keep living in your fantasy world
|
|
|
|
Post by HAHAHA on Mar 10, 2006 18:57:50 GMT -5
midnight tonight same match SCRATCH- BE THERE AND WELL SEE what hAPPENS
|
|
|
|
Post by yeah billy sucks on Mar 10, 2006 19:35:58 GMT -5
and walked out with 2g of fagans money.
|
|
|
|
Post by peanuts on Mar 10, 2006 19:38:35 GMT -5
2g is peanuts plus fagan was only betting 100 bucks, lets bet some real money tonight!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Real Action on Mar 10, 2006 19:58:49 GMT -5
Fu-- the tour for the moment numnuts. This is action and it's an entire different ballgame you freakin imbecile. Smith tied Rubeo, lost to Scianna. Of course on a tour shot Smith would win for fun. These are house conditions. Get over it Jimmy cracker. And if Fagan had any heart, he would bet it up tonight. Don't think so. He's a two bit gambler. Is he still with that faggedy hairdoo we saw on tv a few weeks ago? That said, after he gets whooped tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by JBT on Mar 11, 2006 9:05:28 GMT -5
Did they bowl last night?
|
|
|
|
Post by Its Time on Mar 11, 2006 16:29:30 GMT -5
2g is peanuts plus fagan was only betting 100 bucks, lets bet some real money tonight!!!!!!! Since when did being a big gambler equate to being a good bowler. Do you think it's possible that some people love the heads up competion but enjoy just betting a few dollars to make it even more enjoyable. Do you really think if their good they have to be big betters, one thing really has nothing to do with the other, most big gamblers, gamble just for the sake of the action, not because their great at someting. And most big gamblers that were also great bowlers are broke, just ask one of the very best, the horn, and many others... |
|
|
|
Post by aaa on Mar 11, 2006 21:53:28 GMT -5
I heard wally and fagan bowled 12 games at $1500 a pop and tied 6-6............what a waste of time
|
|
|
|
Post by why on Mar 12, 2006 23:36:34 GMT -5
how come the great fagan can beat a house hack like jim wallace
|
|
|
|
Post by thats why on Mar 13, 2006 8:56:50 GMT -5
cuz theyre bowling on 60 feet oil puddles and its a crapshoot
|
|
|
|
Post by alex on Mar 13, 2006 9:37:17 GMT -5
jim wallace is a house hack ? lol thats funny, where do you people come up with this stuff
|
|
|
|
Post by Reality check on Mar 13, 2006 16:23:12 GMT -5
fagan got a real reality check in the matches again wallace. on 50 feet of oil he couldnt hook it and looked absolutely terrible. all in attendence thought he sucked.
it wasnt a crapshoot. it was a hit your target with the same release game and he failed miserably. thats what bowling should be.
|
|
|
|
Post by YES on Mar 13, 2006 18:56:25 GMT -5
fagan sucked he should be embarrassed.
|
|
|
|
Post by alex on Mar 13, 2006 21:17:25 GMT -5
he broke even after two different days and 18 games, what crack are you people smoking. wallace has a better game for a condition like that and he couldnt even beat fagan.
|
|
